| Opined April 20, 2004 Usher Nonsense #44 – Sixteen Wounded SIXTEEN WOUNDED by Eliam Kraiem, directed by Garry Hynes With Judd Hirsch, Jan Maxwell (Bald Soprano), Omar Metwally, Martha Plimpton, Waleed F. Zuaiter Presented by Jujamcyn Theaters, Producers Four and Robert G. Bartnerin association with Debra Black, Lisa Vioni and Michael Watt Set/costumes - Francis O'Connor, Lights - James F. Ingalls (Second Hand Memory), Original music/sound: John Gromada Well now here are some brave producers. Willing to put up a play that features a Palestinian who asks "Give me a better choice than a bomb. Give me one." And when nothing that is said in response seems to be enough - what do we do? It is a brave moment to put onstage for all of us now far away once again from war. It is this moment to which we are headed from the second Metwally comes hurtling through Hirsch's bakery window. In between those two moments this play tries. It tries and tries and tries. Palestinian boy is befriended by Jewish baker, meets infidel girl, falls in love, gets pregnant, tells her he is a terrorist, is revealed by her to the baker who says 'Not in my back yard!' End of Act One. Act two is nine months later and the baker not only has never confronted the young man in question, he is practicing Arabic prayers for the baby's arrival. The first scene in the second act was nearly a sit com. What happened to the righteous indignation that ended act one? We never really find out. Instead there is a moving moment of Hirsch singing to the baby in its womb. Then he reaches out to the hooker who has been his partner for nine years, and she does not reach back. Finally comes the time when the man and the boy must reveal their secrets, and their shames, and butt heads. I was expecting not to like Hirsch, and I was surprised. He is light on his feet and heavy in his head and heart. He has a history and he lets it have a life in his performance. I expected to like Martha Plimpton, and I didn't, but I think this was due both to the writing as well as the choice of giving the actors accents. It is a habit I've never understood. If the action takes place in Amsterdam, and all the characters are speaking English so that we can understand them, why give them accents? Especially accents that are not consistent. Jan Maxwell is the hooker in her twilight who moves in and out of the story and is not given nearly enough to say. Waleed F. Zuaiter is the brother who shows up to hold the present up to the light so we can see the cracks in the facade as it starts to crumble. The set is grand - a slice of old kitchen and funky bakery; the lighting skillful in giving us not only the harsh kitchen work light, but the intimate touches of lives lived within and without the bakery; the sound very effective - more so in the first act - in putting the city directly outside the bakery door. I wanted to care about these people, but I walked out caring about the situation more. I cared that I sat there and waited for Hirsch's character to give us an answer to the plea "Give me a better choice than a bomb. Give me one." I waited and waited. Which turns the finger back at me. Why am I waiting? Why not create an answer? So yes. Bravely done. Would that the writing supported the courage. ©2004 Tulis McCall |
|||||||||
|
|||||||||