|
Opined April 25, 2004
Usher Nonsense #46 – Prymate
Prymate - by Mark Medoff, directed by Edwin Sherin
with Andre De Shields, Phyllis Frelich, James Naughton and Heather Tom
Sets - Robert Steinberg, Lights - Jeff Nellis, Costumes - Colleen Muscha
at the Longacre
I'm so lost on this one.
A woman in her 50's, who is also a scientist, who is also deaf, steals a gorilla from a lab in the Southwest because he is being used for research on AIDS. She believes his treatment to be inhumane. They retreat to a mountain top. There is no fencing to keep him there. He just sticks around.
Some time later her former lover, and manager of the scientific work, comes looking for her, bringing along a young blonde woman to interpret, using sign language . Funny thing - when the two ex-lovers are left alone on the stage in the last gasp of this play, they communicate just fine alone. So the interpreter is in the play because..... I give up.
Right. Anyway, through her interpreting, we find out about the scientists' old love affair and the AIDS research using the gorilla. We also find out that the gorilla has sexual urges and was in a touchy feelie relationship with a former assistant to the kidnapper scientist. Gosh! Do you think we might see this ourselves? Why, yes! We get to do that! Enter the interpreter to be the object of gorilla lust! What a good reason to have her there....
And why a deaf woman who needs an interpreter? What a cumbersome device to have people translating just so the audience can understand. The author underestimates his viewers. We found out more about the plot in the first few moments watching the scientist and gorilla communicate than we did in much of the remaining action. Put a deaf character onstage and let us see how it really works - lots of action and a shift in the importance of sound. Take a chance on that, for goodness sake.
I also give up about why a gorilla. Was this done just for shock value? Well, yawn, that wears off pretty darn fast. This could have been a story about a woman stealing any animal from a test. (Or better yet - steal a person who is being used.) The one issue of merit that is raised is why do we have the right to test on animals to begin with. Who gave us that right, and what harm to we do? And why there is a man playing a gorilla? Andre De Shields is a wonderful performer - but a gorilla is a big, intimidating, and dangerous hunk of animal. De Shields is none of these things. He is elegant, and precise, and more feline than anything else.
It's one of those productions where I think, "OK - who was the first person to have this idea; who was the second person to hear about it; and who was the third person who failed to stop the first two?"
©2004 Tulis McCall
|